(Insights from the Dead America Podcast)
✨ Part of the Aicracy Podcast Series — conversations about AI, governance, and the future of society.
When people talk about AI in governance, they usually ask “Can we trust the machines?”
But maybe the better question is: “Can we build machines we can trust and still keep humans at the center?”
That was the heart of my conversation with Ed Waters on the Dead America Podcast, where we explored three new ideas that could make Aicracy not just visionary, but practical.
1️⃣ Open-Source Governance: Transparency as the New Constitution
Most systems of power hide their code.
Aicracy proposes the opposite: publish it.
Every citizen should be able to see how the governance AI works, audit its decisions, and even submit bug reports. To prevent manipulation, three independent AIs, one for the government, one for the opposition, and one for an NGO – run in parallel.
Only when all three reach the same conclusion does a law proposal move forward.
If one diverges, humans investigate.
This transforms secrecy into transparency and bureaucracy into verifiable trust.
“Publish the constitutional code. Let the public find the bugs.”
2️⃣ The Right to a Personal AI Mentor
As AI reshapes work, purpose becomes the new currency.
That’s why I believe every person should have access to a personal AI mentor: a guide that helps them discover what they love, where they thrive, and how to grow.
This mentor would be air-gapped completely disconnected from governance systems.
Your conversations, your goals, your emotional data remain yours.
The public AIs shape society.
Your private AI helps shape you.
“Your personal AI mentor is private and stays out of governance.”
3️⃣ Human Guardrails: AI Proposes, Humans Decide
AI can draft policies, simulate outcomes, and measure impact.
But laws should never pass automatically.
In Aicracy, AI proposes and humans dispose.
Elected representatives still vote. Courts remain human.
AI’s role is to provide clarity, not control.
That human oversight keeps justice compassionate, not mechanical—and ensures that technology serves life, not the other way around.
“AI can propose laws; only people pass them. Courts stay human.”
🌍 A Future Built on Trust
In a world racing toward automation, Aicracy is about slowing down just enough to ask:
How do we keep our humanity in the loop?
Transparency, mentorship, and human judgment aren’t old ideas, they’re survival tools for the next stage of civilization.
If we build them into our systems now, we won’t just have smarter governance.
We’ll have trustworthy governance.
Watch the Instagram Reel
👉See the short version!
🎧 Listen to the full conversation on the Dead America Podcast
🧭 Read the book
Related Posts
AI Should Write Our Laws. But It Should Never Judge Us
AI and the Future of Governance — My Talk on Fastlane Founders & Legacy
